Thursday, February 14, 2008

Korean Film Festival is being organized by the Arirang TV Fan Club of Nagaland

For the first time in Nagaland, a Korean Film Festival is being organized by the Arirang TV Fan Club of Nagaland on February 14 at 4 pm at 'The Heritage,' Old DC's Bungalow, Kohima.


Speaking to the local press Arirang TV Fan Club, president, Theja Meru said that Arirang TV, which covers 188 countries, as an important and effective medium, said that building ties with Koreans was a significant opportunity to expose and promote Nagaland in the international level. He asserted that Korea, being a developed nation which promotes culture, value, music, was a nation worth emulating. Realizing the little chance of Nagas in Indian music industry, the club also stated that Naga musicians can be well promoted in Korea, keeping in mind the cultural affinities and similarities of the two nations.

True to its motto "For those who love the finer things in life", the Arirang TV Fan Club has a bunch of fine things to offer. The Korean Film Festival will broadcast three Korean movies: The Way Home, Warriors, Love Traces, and also the Hornbill Festival Episode that was aired on Arirang TV. The festival will feature musical extravaganza from Pirong J, Kimneihoi and Audio Essence, and also give out free gifts sponsored by Gravity and Unitex. The club will also launch 'Sync', a Korean Language Club to be directed by Kusalu, general secretary of Arirang TV Fan Club. The class is open to all, and will be taken every Friday at 2 pm at Dream Café after its launch on February 14.

Theja Meru further informed that membership of the fan club was open to all, with a registration fee of Rs. 50. He also informed the already registered members to re-register again to get ID card of the fan club which can give them access to events organized by the club or receive materials free of cost from Arirang TV. The sponsors for the Korean Film Festival include Nagaland University, Department of Information and Publicity, Reliance Life Insurance, Dream Cafe, Gravity, Unitex, LifePro Events, Limelite, YouthNet, Colors Magazine, LifePro Sound. The Arirang TV Fan Club next plans to organize a Korean-Naga Music Fest, and try to bring the CEO of Arirang TV and officials from Korean Embassy.

The Meitei National Character

By Dr Irengbam Mohendra Singh
Without naivete’ and arrogance,
The effete Meiteis were a warrior nation.
Take a stroll round their extraordinary history,
You will find there is no vibrant future

Manipur existed as an independent and civilised country in the subcontinent of India and the South East Asia. It had its own indigenous religion of Sanamahi, its own language and alphabet. It has been in existent since the Stone Age.
Manipur now is a failed State and the Meiteis are a vanishing nation. Manipur was in the 18th century a Hindu country with Hinduism as its State religion and Hindu Meiteis as the backbone of the nation. The Meitei cultural values were Hindu culture with an intermingling of Sanamahi religion.
The changing society in Manipur in late 20th century posed problems for the Meiteis and forced them to recreate a resurgence of Meitei national character. Manipur is now a multifaith, multicultural and multiethnic country. This is of course a change for the better provided every tribal community is taking part in the running and the development of the State for peaceful coexistence. But it is not to be. Some ethnic communities with different political ideologies are doing the opposite.
In the history of Manipur before the British colonial em (1891- 1947) it was not that the Kukis, the Tangkhuls, the Marings, the Kabuis and the Pangals did not fight for the defence of Manipur, but it was the Meiteis who bore the brunt of the fighting. Manipur was a princely State with Meitei kings. Manipur may not be a gift of the Meiteis but the Meiteis were responsible for keeping Manipur independent until 1891. It was mainly through the blood, sweat and tears of the Meiteis that Manipur is what it is today.
My thesis is non-political. It is a project to identify the collective qualities of the Meiteis as they were. The Meiteis were a Kirata tribe, now conveniently called Indo-Mongoloid tribe that were in existence in Manipur for 3000 years, though only recorded for 2000 years in the Cheitharol Kumbaba.
Nobody knows when and from where the Meiteis migrated to Manipur in the prehistoric times. It must be at least as old as the Aryan migration to India 3000 years ago. It is recorded that when the Vedas were compiled before 1000 BCE, the Kimtas were mentioned in the Yajurveda and Atharveda.
The native religion of Sanamahi cult is unique for the Meiteis. It has incidentally, some similarities in its philosophical and metaphysical content to Hinduism that started as a tribal Vedic religion of Sanatan Dharma.
My undertaking is to define what kind of people, “the Meiteis were” by studying the Meitei mentalities, attitudes, behaviour, social structure, physical prowess and the social status for women, influenced by a variety of religious, political, economic and societal debates with its stress on climate and kingdom, and how they evolved into the 18th century notion of “national character” of the Meiteis.
The Meiteis have always taken for granted who they are without an insight into what has made the Meitei elite and the ‘man in the street’ feel fundamentally alike. This is a form of national consciousness. Once we find it we find the national character of the Meiteis.
The idea of national character of the Meiteis must evolve around some psychological and cultural characteristics in common that binds them together and at the same time separates them from other people.
The concept of “national character” was a subject of debate during the 18th century Europe. It was later generally agreed that each nation has its peculiar characteristics. But what constitutes national character and what are the factors in shaping national traits are still not clear.
By the time of the French Revolution, the idea of a “national character” in France and Germany was formed. But in Britain, because of the nature of the United Kingdom and Empire it remained undeveloped. It took another generation and by about 1830, the idea of “an English national character” began to evolve, still blurred sometimes by the British identity.
In general terms, description of national character ranges from stereotypes to a complex mixture of a series of traits. Each country constitutes a nation with a peculiar set of characteristics. Sometimes the people of the neighbouring provinces and communities differ sharply from each other. Certain traits of the Meiteis differ for instance, from the Tangkhul Nagas or the Thadou Kukis.
For the identity of Meitei national character, it is necessary to see if there is any distinctive spirit, character, ceremonies, laws, tastes, quirks, habits and foibles. It is also important to observe how the Meiteis eat, drink, work, play, shop, drive, fight and flirt as well as their personality traits, adaptive skills, discipline, disunity or unity.
Equally valuable is the study of how the Meiteis told themselves who they were and how they related themselves to their history, culture, society, indigenous religion, new religion, climate and the Government.
The simpler view of a national character is a series of mental and moral qualities in terms of virtues and vices. It is recognized that women play an important role in moulding the nation and how the changing condition of women would modify national characteristics. It is also to be noted that qualities attributed to a nation are not found in every member of the society.
My article (a research paper i.e. borrowing from many) which is far from being an erudite and well crafted intellectual history has significant contributions from many authors whose names I intend to give a miss.
I am not writing a doctoral thesis with computations of significant deviations while judging the Meitei national character. The basis of my thesis is empirical analysis i.e. observation, experience and correlation of regularities.
National character does not reflect only simple personality trait levels such as in days gone by, when orthodox Meiteis did not eat food cooked by the Mayangs during their pilgrimage to Hindu holy places in India.
The concept of a nation having a national character was disputed by some outdated anthropologists and psychologists. I do not agree. There is an English national character, a Bengali or Punjabi national character. Nearer to home, there is a Tangkhul or Kuki national character.
What has prompted me to write this article? I have always had a nagging question at the back of mind about why the Meiteis tend to fight physically with the least provocation. I am the epitome of this unwelcome character.
I had my share of rough and tumble fights during my school and college days. They were because I thought rightly or wrongly, with or without sufficient provocation, when I felt I was intimidated or my character was assassinated. Among these only two deserve mention here as they could have ruined my entire life with imprisonment.
One was as a student at St Edmund’s college, Shillong when I beat up a College lecturer as I felt that my character was assassinated. The other was as a House Surgeon in Irwin Hospital, Delhi when I slapped a nurse on the Ward as I felt that she was too arrogant and she called me stupid.
As a young doctor in Imphal, I went to see an ill priest who was the Principal of the Don Bosco School. I recognised him as the Principal of St Anthony’s College at Shillong at the time of my incident, 10 years ago. Before my time, Meitei students at Shillong were infamous for pugnacious behaviour. This Catholic priest was very aware of this peculiar Meitei character.
As he did not know my past history of the Shillong incident, I broached the subject of why the Meitei boys were so disposed to physical fights. He simply told me that the Meiteis having lived in cloistered Manipur had “inferiority complex.” As a result they became aggressive when they came out of Manipur, by over asserting themselves.
I half-espoused his theory as it did not quite agree with my character. I never had any inferiority complex; just the opposite. I was born in a prosperous family; I grew up in style and affluence above the average youth of my generation. Besides, I had been out of Manipur. However, in my college studies I learnt that people with inferiority complex, suffered from an unrealistic feeling of general inadequacy caused by actual or supposed inferiority in one sphere, sometimes marked by aggressive behaviour in compensation.
Later in my life, I began to wonder about the truth of the matter. Even at my ripe old age with a successful medical career, I am still lumbered with this trait. As recently as 3 years ago, my son, my wife and I went to attend a wedding of a grand daughter of mine in Delhi. With lots of excitement we went. I organised a cocktail dinner with the military band through the good offices of my friend General Jagdish at his Army Headquarters in Delhi. We introduced ourselves and entertained the Punjabi fiancee and would be in-laws of our grand daughter.
The next day was the wedding at Gurgaun, which they organised mainly with some financial help given by the mother and uncles of my niece. We went there but were completely ignored by the in laws. As the evening wore on and the whiskies took away the inhibitions, my aggressive trait came to the fore. I gave them a piece of my mind.
It was very unpleasant and I was extremely sorry for my grand-daughter (she and her mother have since disappeared from the radar). But I am not repentant. I have never allowed an insult to pass without retribution. If I had been a Punjabi it would not have happened. I know from experience; I move in high Punjabi society in Delhi.
When I was a College student my eldest brother and I boarded a train in Delhi bound for Bombay. There were four of us in the first class compartment with 4 berths. As the train left Delhi station one of the Punjabi chaps asked me where I came from. It led to an argument. The man said to the other remarking that, “Heaps of these people (me) and heaps of these Sirdars (Sikhs) are giving India a bad name.” At this my brother who was lying on the upper birth said in a commanding tone: “That’s enough.” Everybody went silent and to sleep until we arrived at the Victoria Terminus the next morning.
Following my niece’s wedding I decided to do some research about our national character. The first thing the research tells me is that our personalities generally do not change after about the age of 25. They are well entombed within each of us as a lifetime habit, attitude and approach.
Research in the past (2000) always indicated that individuals with “low esteem” (inferiority complex) are more aggressive than individuals with “high esteem” (superiority complex). However recent research (2005) found that individuals with low esteem as well as high esteem were associated with self-reported physical aggression.
Further research (2006) concluded that the long standing view that low esteem causes violence has been shown to be wrong. And that a specific type of high esteem produces high aggression.
On further research, people who are high on a trait of an elevated type of self esteem are more reactive to moderate provocation than those who are low on the trait, react to strong provocation. The trait is known as “narcissism” (excessive interest in oneself). The Meiteis have this trait.
This Meitei trait of a superiority complex is easily discernable from old Meitei patriotic songs such as nungshida ima meitei leima, maikei salai khudingda... It was often sung by my friend Haobam Ibechaobi from Uripok and hougatlone ichin inaosa khonglakle mangolgi bashi often sung by Chanambam Ongbi Bimola also from Uripok.
The modern study of human physiology (2007) by brain scan shows that social rejection (negative complex) activates brain areas that generate physical pain. It also shows that when we feel or are made to feel socially inferior, two areas of the brain become activated. One area makes you feel like sinking at the bottom of the abyss; the other area motivates to stave off the pain of feeling second rate and we are compelled to compensate as a reward.
The purpose of my thesis is to discover what kind of people are the Meiteis and what are their characteristic traits and behaviour that distinguish them ftom other people.
— to be contd

Yahoo Exploring Alliance With News Corp.

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) - Yahoo Inc. is discussing a possible partnership with News Corp. in its latest effort to repel Microsoft Corp. or prod its unsolicited suitor into raising its current takeover bid, according to a person familiar with the talks.

The specifics of the joint venture still hadn't been worked out, said the person who didn't want to be identified because of the sensitivity of the matter.

Both The Wall Street Journal and a prominent blog, TechCrunch, reported that News Corp. is interested in folding its popular online social network, MySpace.com, and other Internet assets into Yahoo - an idea that first came up last year. News Corp. owns The Wall Street Journal.

News Corp. and a private equity firm also would buy significant stakes in Yahoo in a complex deal designed to boost the Sunnyvale-based company's market value above Microsoft's initial bid of $44.6 billion, or $31 per share.

A Yahoo spokesman said the company continues to "carefully and thoroughly" evaluate alternatives that will enrich its long-term shareholders.

News Corp. spokeswoman Teri Everett declined to comment.

Although News Corp. Chairman Rupert Murdoch made it clear in a conference call last week that his New York-based company had no interest in an outright acquisition of Yahoo, he didn't rule out the possibility of a deal involving MySpace.

Yahoo rejected Microsoft's offer Monday, insisting that its Internet franchise is worth more money. Microsoft has held firm on its bid so far, dubbing it "full and fair" while threatening to launch a hostile takeover attempt.

Besides talking with News Corp., Yahoo has explored an advertising partnership with its biggest rival, Internet search leader Google Inc.

Although Google probably could help elevate Yahoo's recently drooping profits, the alliance would likely face antitrust hurdles because the two companies operate the Web's two biggest ad networks and eliminating one would reduce competition.

If Yahoo is able to work out a deal with News Corp., analysts believe Microsoft will simply raise its offer because it needs the acquisition to counteract Google's dominance of the online ad market - a battleground that is rapidly reshaping the technology and media industries.

"Buying Yahoo makes tremendous sense for Microsoft, more sense than any other company in the world," said Ken Marlin, a New York investment banker specializing in media and technology deals.


Copyright 2008 The Associated Press. The information contained in the AP news report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press. Active hyperlinks have been inserted by AOL.
02/13/2008 16:39 ET

Winkler Testifies in John Ritter Lawsuit

GLENDALE, Calif. (AP) - Actor Henry Winkler has described for a Los Angeles court what happened the last time he saw deceased actor John Ritter. The former "Happy Days" star took the stand Wednesday to testify in a lawsuit against two doctors. Ritter's family is suing a radiologist who had earlier given Ritter a body scan and the cardiologist who treated him at the hospital.

Winkler says he last saw Ritter on the set of the show "8 Simple Rules ... For Dating My Teenage Daughter." Later that night, he says he got a phone call and learned that Ritter died.

The sitcom star was 54 when he died of a torn aorta after going to a hospital where he was treated for a heart attack.


Copyright 2008 The Associated Press. The information contained in the AP news report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press. Active hyperlinks have been inserted by AOL.
02/13/2008 17:10 ET

Top Hezbollah Militant Killed in Syria

DAMASCUS, Syria (AP) - One of the world's most wanted and elusive terrorists, Imad Mughniyeh, was killed in a car bombing in Syria nearly 15 years after dropping from sight. The one-time Hezbollah security chief was the suspected mastermind of attacks that killed hundreds of Americans in Lebanon and of the brutal kidnappings of Westerners.

The Lebanese Shiite militant group Hezbollah and its top ally, Iran, blamed Israel on Wednesday for the assassination. Israel denied any role.

Mughniyeh was also on the FBI's list of most wanted terrorists, and the U.S. State Department had offered a $5 million reward for information leading to his arrest or conviction. He was indicted in the U.S. for his role in planning the 1985 hijacking of a TWA airliner in which a U.S. Navy diver was killed.

The United States welcomed Mughniyeh's death.

"The world is a better place without this man in it," State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said. "One way or the other, he was brought to justice."

The hijacking was the only attack on Americans for which Mughniyeh was charged, but he carried out or directed a series of terrorist spectaculars aimed at the United States and Jewish targets.

Mughniyeh's death was the latest in a series of blows to major terror figures in recent weeks. Abu Laith al-Libi, a senior al-Qaida leader, was killed in Pakistan in late January by a missile fired from a U.S. drone. This week, Pakistani security forces critically wounded and captured Mansour Dadullah, a top Taliban figure, in a firefight near the Afghan border.

But Mughniyeh, a Shiite Muslim not known to be connected to the Sunni al-Qaida or Taliban, harkened back to an earlier era of terror. A secretive, underground operator whose name was not even known for years, he was one of the first to turn Islamic militancy's weapons against the United States in the 1980s.

Mughniyeh emerged during the turmoil of Lebanon's 1975-1990 civil war, rising to become Hezbollah's security chief, and the dramatic suicide bombings he is accused of engineering in Beirut were some of the deadliest against Americans until al-Qaida's Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.

He vanished in the early 1990s, reportedly undergoing plastic surgery and moving between Lebanon, Syria and Iran on fake passports. But Western intelligence agencies believe he then took his terror attacks abroad, hitting Jewish and Israeli interests in Argentina, among other places.

One Western official, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss intelligence matters, said Wednesday that Mughniyeh was linked to the 1996 bombing of the Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia, an attack which killed 19 Americans.

Mughniyeh continued to head external operations for Hezbollah and was "very active and very dangerous," the official said.

His slaying could raise tensions between Israel and Hezbollah, as well as with the militant group's allies, Syria and Iran. Israel and Hezbollah fought a bloody war in the summer of 2006, and some Lebanese figures close to the Shiite militant group called Wednesday for attacks against Israel in retaliation for Mughniyeh's death.

It could also worsen the turmoil in Lebanon, where Hezbollah is locked in a power struggle with the U.S.-backed government.

Hezbollah called for a huge turnout at Mughniyeh's funeral in south Beirut on Thursday. The same day, government supporters are planning a rally of hundreds of thousands in downtown Beirut to mark the third anniversary of the assassination of former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri.

With fears growing of street violence between the two camps, the U.S. Embassy strongly encouraged American citizens in Lebanon to limit all but essential travel Thursday.

Hezbollah announced on its Al-Manar television that Mughniyeh "became a martyr at the hands of the Zionist Israelis." The station played Quranic verses in memorial and aired a rare, apparently recent picture of Mughniyeh - showing a burly, bespectacled man with a black and gray beard wearing military camouflage and a military cap.

Syrian Interior Minister Brig. Gen. Bassam Abdul-Majid said Mughniyeh was killed Tuesday night in a car bombing in the upscale Damascus neighborhood of Kfar Sousse, the state news agency SANA reported.

Witnesses in the Syrian capital said the explosion tore apart the silver Mitsubishi Pajero, killing a passer-by and leaving only the front of the SUV intact. Security forces sealed off the area and removed the body. The Lebanese television station LBC said Mughniyeh was leaving a ceremony at an Iranian school and was approaching his car when it blew up. By Wednesday, the area had been cleared and there was no indication a car bombing had taken place.

The killing is deeply embarrassing to Syria, showing that the wanted fugitive was hiding on its soil. The United States has accused Syria, home to a number of radical Palestinian leaders, of supporting terrorism.

Iran blamed Israel for the assassination, with Foreign Ministry spokesman Mohammad Ali Hosseini calling the bombing "yet another brazen example of organized state terrorism by the Zionist regime."

In the past, when Israel has been fingered - rightly or wrongly - as responsible for attacks on targets beyond its borders, it has generally responded with impenetrable silence, for example over last September's airstrike on an as-yet undisclosed target in Syria.

This time Israel was quick to deny any role, possibly because it could pay a price for public claims.

"Israel rejects the attempt by terror groups to attribute to it any involvement in this incident. We have nothing further to add," Prime Minister Ehud Olmert's office said in a statement.

Hezbollah captured two Israeli soldiers on the border between the two countries in July 2006, sparking an Israeli incursion into south Lebanon and a 34-day war. While Hezbollah has not come forward with evidence that the soldiers are alive, Israel regards them as such until it is proved otherwise and would not want to jeopardize their return.

Mughniyeh might have been killed by a rival group and not by a Western intelligence service, said Eliezer Tsafrir, who was the Mossad's Beirut station chief in 1983 and 1984, the time of the first attacks against U.S. targets in which Mughniyeh was implicated.

"These people make a lot of internal enemies. So it doesn't necessarily have to be Israel or America," Tsafrir said.

But regardless of whether it was behind the attack, experts say Israel may benefit from a perception its Mossad spy agency has recovered its ability to hit top terror targets.

Mughniyeh was born on Dec. 7, 1962 in the south Lebanon village of Tair Debba. He joined the nascent Hezbollah in the early 1980s and formed a militant cell known as Islamic Jihad or Islamic Holy War. The cell was said to be Hezbollah's strike arm, but the group denies any link to it.

He is accused of masterminding the first major suicide bombing to target Americans: the April 1983 car bombing of the U.S. Embassy in Beirut that killed 63 people, including 17 Americans. He is also blamed for a more devastating attack six months later, when suicide attackers detonated truck bombs at the barracks of French and U.S. peacekeeping forces in Beirut, killing 59 French paratroopers and 241 American Marines.

He was indicted in the United States for the 1985 hijacking of TWA flight 847, during which Shiite militants shot Navy diver Robert Stethem, who was a passenger on the plane, and dumped his body on the tarmac of Beirut airport. The hijacking produced one of the most iconic images of pre-9/11 terrorism: a photo of the jet's pilot leaning out the cockpit window with a gunman waving a pistol in front of his face.

In the 1980s Mughniyeh was also believed to have directed a string of kidnappings of Americans and other foreigners in Lebanon. The hostages included The Associated Press's chief Mideast correspondent Terry Anderson, who was held for more than six years until his release in 1991; and CIA station chief William Buckley, who was tortured by his captors and killed in 1985.

"I can't say I'm either surprised or sad (by his death). He was not a good man - certainly, the primary actor in my kidnapping and many others," Anderson told the AP on Wednesday. "To hear that his career has finally ended is a good thing, and it's appropriate that he goes up in a car bomb."

Anderson was the last American hostage freed in a complicated deal that involved Israel's release of Lebanese prisoners, Iran's sway with the kidnappers, Syria's influence and - according to an Iranian radio broadcast - promises by the United States and Germany not to retaliate against the kidnappers.

But Edward Djerejian, who was U.S. ambassador to Syria at the time and was involved in negotiations through the Syrian government on hostage releases, said he had "no knowledge of such a deal" promising not to retaliate. "When I was in government we made no deals," he told the AP.

Giandomenico Picco, an Italian diplomat working at the time as a special assistant to U.N. Secretary-General Javier Perez de Cuellar, said he was certain but never able to confirm that the hooded man he met in the slums of Beirut to finalize the deal was Mughniyeh.

Mughniyeh's trail of terror was believed to continue into the 1990s.

Israel accused Mughniyeh of involvement in the 1992 bombing of its embassy in Buenos Aires, Argentina in which 29 people were killed.

Argentine special prosecutor Alberto Nisman also accused Mughniyeh in the 1994 bombing of a Buenos Aires Jewish center, an attack which killed 85 people. Prosecutors said Iranian officials orchestrated the attack and entrusted Hezbollah to carry it out.

The Khobar Towers bombing came two years later. Faris bin Hizam, a Saudi journalist who closely follows Islamic groups, said Mughniyeh flew to the kingdom days before the bombing and met the group that carried out the attack.

Mughniyeh spent his final years moving between Lebanon, Iran, Syria and Turkey, and used as many as 47 different forged passports, bin Hizam said.

His last public appearance was believed to be at the funeral of his brother Fuad, who was killed in 1994 by a booby-trapped car in Beirut. In 2006, Mughniyeh was reported to have met with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in Syria.

Mughniyeh's body was brought to south Beirut in the afternoon and was laid in a refrigerated coffin, wrapped in Hezbollah's yellow flag.

His father - Fayez, a south Lebanese farmer - as well as Hezbollah's deputy leader, Sheik Naim Kassem, and other Hezbollah officials received condolences at the hall from allied Lebanese politicians and representatives of militant Palestinian factions. Though bitter rivals of Hezbollah, some pro-U.S. politicians including Lebanese Prime Minister Fuad Saniora and parliamentary majority leader Saad Hariri offered written condolences.

____

Associated Press writers Matt Apuzzo and Pamela Hess in Washington and Carley Petesch in New York contributed to this story.

On the Net:

Rebate Checks in the Mail by Spring

WASHINGTON (AP) - The checks aren't in the mail, but they will be soon. President Bush signed legislation Wednesday to rush rebates ranging from $300 to $1,200 to millions of people, the centerpiece of government efforts to brace the wobbly economy. First, though, you must file your 2007 tax return.

More than 130 million people are expected to get the rebates, starting around May. Congress, Bush, the Federal Reserve and Wall Street are hoping the money will burn such a hole in people's pockets that they won't be able to resist spending it. And the spending is supposed to give an energizing jolt to a national economy that is in danger of toppling into a recession if it hasn't already.

Whether people actually spend the money remains to be seen. A recent Associated Press-Ipos poll indicates most people have other plans. Forty-five percent said they planned to pay off bills, while 32 percent said they would save or invest it. Only 19 percent said they would spend their rebates.

The measure Bush signed - a $168 billion rescue package passed with lightning speed by Congress last week - includes not only rebates for individuals but also tax breaks for businesses to spur investment in new plants and equipment. That, too, would help bolster U.S. economic activity. The package also contains provisions aimed at helping struggling homeowners clobbered by the housing collapse and the credit crunch refinance into more affordable mortgages.

The emergency plan marked a rare moment of cooperation among political rivals fearful that an ailing economy during an election year would invite voter retaliation.

Bush, who called the measure "a booster shot for our economy," praised the bipartisan cooperation. "We have come together on a single mission - and that is to put the people's interests first," he said.

Who gets a rebate? Most people who pay taxes or earn at least $3,000, including through Social Security or veterans' disability benefits. Singles making more than $75,000 and couples with income topping $150,000, however, will get smaller checks, up to the top limits for any rebate: incomes of $87,000 for individuals and $174,000 for couples.

To get any rebate, you must file a 2007 tax return and have a valid Social Security number. If you already filed your 2007 return, the IRS says you don't need to do anything extra.

Most taxpayers will receive a check of up to $600 for individuals and $1,200 for couples, with an additional $300 for each child.

People earning too little to pay taxes but at least $3,000 - including elderly people whose only income is from Social Security and veterans who live on disability payments - will get $300 if single, or $600 if a couple.

The IRS will send out rebates - by mail or by direct deposit into your bank account - through the late spring and the summer. The rebates come in addition to any regular tax refund.

To pay for the rebates - which are estimated to cost about $117 billion over the next two years - the government will have to borrow more money, enlarging the budget deficit.

The Bush administration and some private economists are hopeful the rebates, tax breaks and aggressive interest rate reductions by the Federal Reserve will help the country narrowly dodge a recession. An increasing number of economists, however, believe the country has already fallen into its first recession since 2001, and they are simply hopeful the rescue package will limit the damage. Most people - 61 percent - say the economy is now in a recession, according to the AP-Ipsos poll.

"I do think this will give the economy a shot of adrenaline," said Stuart Hoffman, chief economist at PNC Financial Services Group.

The National Bureau of Economic Research, a private research organization, looked at what people did with their 2001 rebates. The study found that "households spent about 20 to 40 percent of their rebates on nondurable goods" - which can include things like food and clothing - in the first three months. They spent roughly another third in the following three months.

With the current stimulus, the economy will log growth in the range of 2.25 percent to 2.50 percent in the second half of this year - roughly one full percentage point higher than without the bracing tonic, Hoffman estimated. That would be closer to a more normal rate of around 3 percent, he said.

That in turn should encourage businesses to step up hiring. Nervous employers cut 17,000 jobs in January, the first nationwide loss of jobs in more than four years.

Edward Lazear, chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, predicted, "The stimulus will have the effect of increasing jobs by about half a million above the number that would have been the case in the absence of that."

Still, even with the rescue efforts, some analysts fear the economy could backslide and flirt with recession again in 2009.

To help the severely depressed housing market, the stimulus package would raise temporarily to $729,750 the limit on Federal Housing Administration loans and also raise the cap on loans that mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac can buy.

Raising those limits, should provide relief in the market for "jumbo" mortgages - those exceeding $417,000. The credit crunch hit that market hard, making it very difficult, if not impossible, for people to get those loans. That has plunged the housing market even deeper into turmoil.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California said the provisions will provide "families a second chance at the American dream of homeownership by helping them refinance their mortgages and avoid foreclosure."


Copyright 2008 The Associated Press. The information contained in the AP news report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press. Active hyperlinks have been inserted by AOL.
02/13/2008 17:26 ET

Obama Proposes $210 Billion for New Jobs

JANESVILLE, Wis. (AP) - Democrat Barack Obama said Wednesday that as president he would spend $210 billion to create jobs in construction and environmental industries, as he tried to win over economically struggling voters.

Obama's investment would be over 10 years as part of two programs. The larger is $150 billion to create 5 million so-called "green collar" jobs to develop more environmentally friendly energy sources.

Sixty-billion dollars would go to a National Infrastructure Reinvestment Bank to rebuild highways, bridges, airports and other public projects. Obama estimated that could generate nearly 2 million jobs, many of them in the construction industry that's been hit by the housing crisis.

"This agenda is paid for," Obama said as the Republican National Committee promoted an "Obama Spend-O-Meter" online to track his proposals and portray him as a tax-and-spend liberal. Obama explained that the money for his spending proposals will come from ending the Iraq war, cutting tax breaks for corporations, taxing carbon pollution and raising taxes on high income earners.

Neera Tanden, Hillary Rodham Clinton's policy director, said Obama was offering ideas Clinton proposed months ago. "Voters may ask themselves that if Senator Obama cannot produce his own ideas on the campaign trail, how will he solve new problems as president?" Tanden said in a memo e-mailed to reporters.

Obama, who has faced criticism that he doesn't have enough policy specifics, asked autoworkers at the General Motors plant in Janesville, Wis., to "bear with me" as his began a policy speech that he said would be unlike his typical rousing addresses. He read from a TelePrompTer in an industrial training room, flanked by sparkling new vehicles and a large American flag.

"Today I want to take it down a notch," Obama said. "This is going to be a speech that's a little more detailed. It's going to be a little bit longer, not as many applause lines."

Obama pointedly did not include one of his biggest applause lines, that he would require vehicle manufacturers to raise fuel economy standards. Obama often points out that he delivered that message straight to the automakers during a speech last year in Detroit.

But he didn't mention it on the plant visit that came a day after GM reported the largest annual loss ever for an American automaker - $38.7 billion in 2007.

"I know that General Motors received some bad news yesterday," Obama said. "I also know how much progress you've made, how many hybrids and fuel-efficient vehicles you're churning out. And I believe that if our government is there to support you, and give you the assistance you need to retool and make this transition, that this plant will be here for another hundred years."

Obama heads into Tuesday's Wisconsin primary as the favorite in the state and the front-runner for the nomination. His victories in the last eight contests have put him ahead of Clinton in the delegate chase.

But Obama did not pursue the front-runner strategy of ignoring rivals. He repeatedly criticized Clinton in an effort to beat back the challenge she still poses to him.

He tied her to likely Republican presidential nominee John McCain for their shared vote to authorize the war in Iraq. He lumped her with President Bush for offering an economic recovery plan that didn't include immediate relief, without mentioning that both the president and Clinton quickly adopted tax rebates.

Obama's appearance in Janesville was part of a strategy to reach out to voters who might be struggling in the economy and who have supported Clinton in most contests so far. Combining exit polls from 19 states that had competitive Democratic primaries before Tuesday, Clinton had a 49 percent to 46 percent edge over Obama with voters who named the economy as the No. 1 problem.

But Obama seemed to be turning that around in his most recent victories Tuesday. In Virginia and Maryland, Obama dominated among the one-half of Democratic voters who named the economy as their chief concern. In both states, about six in 10 Democrats who cited the economy voted for Obama.

On the Net: