Friday, July 3, 2009

U.S. Marines Taking Over Towns in Afghanistan


NAWA, Afghanistan — U.S. forces have encountered little resistance in the initial phase of a massive operation by some 4,000 Marines in Taliban-controlled areas of southern Afghanistan, but that's a common tactic by insurgents.

The hard part will be winning support in a region where few foreigners have ventured. The lack of resistance by insurgents in Helmand province in the mission's first phase could change in coming days, said Capt. Bill Pelletier, a spokesman for the unit, on Friday.

The operation's focus is not killing the Taliban but winning the local population over, Pelletier said -- a difficult task in a region where foreigners are viewed with suspicion, and few have stayed for long.
"We are not worried about the Taliban, we are not focused on them. We are focused on the people," Pelletier said. "It is important to engage with the key leaders, hear what they need most and what are their priorities."

The offensive along 55 miles of Taliban-controlled areas in southern Afghanistan will test the Obama administration's new strategy of holding territory to let the Afghan government sink roots in Helmand.

The insurgency has proven particularly resilient in the area, and foreign troops have never before operated in such large numbers here. Large areas have been under Taliban control, with little or no government presence.

As the operation entered its second day, the units secured control of the district centers of Nawa and Garmser, and negotiated entry into Khan Neshin, the capital of Rig district, Pelletier said.

"They waited for the local and village elders," outside Khan Neshin and "with their permission they went in and now are engaged in talks," Pelletier said.

One Marine was killed and several others injured or wounded on the first full day of the assault Thursday, the largest military operation in Afghanistan since the fall of Taliban government in 2001.

But there have been no big battles, with militants choosing to mostly keep their guns silent, Pelletier said.Taking ground from the Taliban in Afghanistan has always proved easy. Keeping it and ensuring the government's presence has been the difficult part. When the area happens to be the world's largest producer of opium that feeds the insurgency and corrupts government officials, the challenge becomes monumental.

Haji Akhtar Mohammad, from Gereshk village now living in Helmand's capital of Lashkar Gah, said the U.S.-led force will not have community support in the region weary of any foreign interference.

"It is difficult to tell who is Taliban and who is civilians," Mohammad said. "They all have the same face, same beard and same turban," he said. "It is very difficult to defeat them."

Three years ago, only a handful of U.S. troops were in Helmand, Afghanistan's biggest province that is bisected by the Helmand river.

Afghanistan accounts for more than 90 percent of the world's production of opium, and Helmand alone is responsible for about half that amount.

While Pelletier said winning hearts and minds was the mission's main focus, other military officials have said the immediate goal of the offensive is to clear away insurgents before Afghanistan's Aug. 20 presidential election.

Southern Afghanistan is a Taliban stronghold but also a region where Afghan President Hamid Karzai is seeking votes from fellow Pashtun tribesmen. Without such a large Marine assault, the Afghan government would likely not be able to set up voting booths where citizens could safely travel.

The Pentagon is deploying 21,000 additional troops to Afghanistan in time for the elections and expects the total number of U.S. forces there to reach 68,000 by year's end. That is double the number of troops in Afghanistan in 2008 but still half as many as are now in Iraq.

Even bigger challenges, perhaps, will come in the weeks and months after the Marines have established their presence here.

The U.S. will have an opportunity to help develop alternate livelihoods for farmers whose opium poppy crops bankroll the Taliban, who have made a violent comeback since the U.S.-led invasion.

Afghan rebels capture US soldier


A
US soldier has been captured by militants in eastern Afghanistan, the US military has said.

The soldier is believed to be the first seized in either Iraq or Afghanistan for at least two years.

News of the capture came as US and Afghan forces began a major operation against Taliban forces in southern Helmand province.

One of the two latest British deaths was that of the highest-ranking Army officer to be killed since 1982.

The US military says the aim of the offensive is to provide security ahead of presidential elections this August.

Map: Helmand river valley region

Helmand has seen the worst violence anywhere in Afghanistan, and military commanders say they need to break what they call the stalemate in the south of the country, says the BBC's Martin Patience in the Afghan capital, Kabul.The army was using all its resources to find the missing serviceman, who was taken on Tuesday, spokeswoman Capt Elizabeth Mathias said.

AFP news agency said a commander of Haqqani, named only as Bahram, said the soldier was captured along with three Afghans in the Yousuf Khail district of Paktika province.

The commander said the soldier had been taken to "a safe place".

Another Haqqani commander, Mullah Sangeen, told Reuters the soldier would be held until Taliban fighters detained by the US were released. The BBC's security correspondent Frank Gardner says the circumstances of this capture are strange and potentially very embarrassing for the Pentagon.

The Taliban are claiming he was drunk when they caught him, he says.

There is no indication he became separated during a firefight - rather that he wandered off out of his base with the three Afghans, our correspondent adds.

'Massive force'

The US military says about 4,000 marines as well as 650 Afghan troops - supported by Nato planes - are involved in the Helmand operation.

Marines spokesman Brig Gen Larry Nicholson said the operation was different from previous ones because of the "massive size of the force" and its speed.

A Taliban spokesman said the group would resist in various ways and that there would be no permanent US victory.

New strategy

It is the first such large-scale operation since US President Barack Obama authorised the deployment of 21,000 extra US troops to Afghanistan, as part of a new strategy for winning the conflict.

Many of those troops are being redeployed from operations in Iraq.

The operation began when units moved into the Helmand River valley in the early hours of Thursday. Helicopters and heavy transport vehicles carried out the advance, with Nato planes providing air cover.

Our correspondent in Kabul says the idea is that they will move into towns and villages which are under Taliban control.

With the fresh US deployments, military commanders say they are confident that they will make "significant" gains this summer, even if, as our correspondent says, a decisive victory is unlikely.

Air operations

UK-led forces in Helmand launched their own operation to combat the Taliban insurgency last week, in what the UK's Ministry of Defence described as one of the largest air operations in modern times.

Thousands of British forces under Nato command have been fighting the Taliban in Helmand since 2006, but there has been criticism that they have been overstretched and under-resourced.

One of two British soldiers killed in an explosion in Helmand province on Wednesday was the highest-ranking Army officer to die since the Falklands war of 1982, the Ministry of Defence said.

He was named at Lt Col Rupert Thorneloe, 39, the commanding officer of the 1st Battalion Welsh Guards. Trooper Joshua Hammond, 18, also died, and six others injured.

General Sir Richard Dannatt, Chief of the General Staff, said Lt Col Thornloe was "an outstanding commanding officer" and his death was a "devastating blow".

He added: "At the leading edge of his generation, his loss will be felt deeply not only by his family but also by his soldiers and others, who like me, had the privilege to serve with him."

The two men were killed when a roadside bomb exploded under their Viking armoured vehicle. Lt Col Thornloe had joined a supply convoy to see his men deployed on operation Panther's Claw, to oust the Taliban from the area around Lashkar Gah.

The BBC's defence correspondent Caroline Wyatt says questions will be asked about why such a high-ranking officer was travelling a Viking vehicle.

They are supposed to be restricted to lower-risk areas, and are due to be replaced in Afghanistan next year by the more heavily armoured 'Warthog' vehicle.

Air India employees to go on strike over non-payment of salaries

New Delhi, July 2 (ANI): Employees of India's flagship carrier Air India have announced they will be on strike for two hours on Friday in protest against the non-payment of salaries.Air India has said it will not be able to pay the salaries tomorrow as scheduled. In retaliation, the employees said they would go on a strike between two and four in the afternoon, and thereafter on an indefinite strike.ivil Aviation Minister Praful Patel has said the government cannot bail Air India out every time, and it is time for the flagship carrier to tighten its belt and resolve its financial woes.


Air India's borrowings have risen from Rs.6, 550 crore in November 2007 to Rs.15, 241 crore in June this year.

He said that the airline has been asked to prepare a restructuring plan in the next 30 days.

In reply to a question in the Lok Sabha, Patel said the borrowings have gone up largely due to servicing of debt on account of purchase of new aircraft and its operating losses, which have compounded due to the present economic recession and the high oil prices last year.

He said the National Aviation Company of India Limited (NACIL) has been advised to formulate "a concrete proposal for equity induction and provision of loans".

Patel also made it clear that there was no plan to retrench any employee of Air India.

He later told reporters outside Parliament that government's support to Air India "cannot be taken for granted".

The carrier plans to start a low-fare airline for the domestic sector as new budget airlines gain market share.

The carrier may set up under the Air India Express brand, which now is a low-fare unit for international routes, chief commercial officer Tara Naidu said. (ANI)

Los Angeles police under scrutiny in Jackson death

L
OS ANGELES -The investigation of Michael Jackson's death is widening as questions intensify about the drugs he took, the doctors who provided them and the actions of police.
Why didn't police seal the mansion where he had been living? Why were moving vans seen at the home, and were any items removed before police wrapped up their search? Why didn't they get immediate search warrants? Why did they tow away a doctor's car right after the death but not declare the home a crime scene?
Los Angeles police say proper procedures were followed based on the circumstances officers encountered when they were called to the home at 12:21 p.m. on June 25. A doctor was attending to Jackson and stayed with him when he was placed in an ambulance at 1:07 p.m. There was no sign of foul play.
Others say police should have assumed it was possible a crime occurred and taken precautions to ensure the scene was not disrupted so evidence wasn't lost or tainted.
"If I was the chief detective on the case, I would have said, 'We don't know what's going on. We should seal the scene,'" said defense attorney Harland Braun, who has represented celebrities including Robert Blake, Roseanne and Gary Busey. "You always have to think of the worst-case scenario and you have to think fast. I would have sealed the scene just because it was Michael Jackson."
Whether the Jackson probe turns into a criminal investigation hinges on what evidence emerges involving the drugs. Charges could be brought if authorities determine Jackson had been overly prescribed medications, if he had been given drugs inappropriate for his medical needs, or if doctors knowingly prescribed Jackson medications under an assumed name.
It's still not known what caused Jackson's death at age 50. The pop star went into cardiac arrest in his bedroom and his personal physician, Dr. Conrad Murray, performed CPR while an ambulance was called, according to Murray's lawyers. Murray has spoken to police and authorities say he is not a suspect, though his actions have come under scrutiny because his own lawyers acknowledge it may have taken up to a half-hour for an ambulance to be summoned.
An autopsy was conducted but results are not expected for several weeks. The Jackson family had a second autopsy performed and those results also are pending.
On Wednesday, The Associated Press learned Los Angeles police asked the Drug Enforcement Administration to assist in the investigation.
DEA agents participated in the investigation of the 2007 overdose death of Anna Nicole Smith at a Florida hotel. California Attorney General Jerry Brown investigated her former boyfriend and two of her doctors.
Brown handed the investigation over to the Los Angeles district attorney's office, which filed charges of conspiring to provide Smith with prescription drugs.
Brown said the suspects broke the law because Smith was a "known addict." The former boyfriend and doctors denied the charges.
The DEA also probed whether painkillers found in actor Heath Ledger's system after his death last year were obtained illegally. Federal prosecutors did not charge anyone.
Jean Rosenbluth, a University of Southern California law professor, said the agency's involvement in the Jackson case suggests authorities are looking into whether drugs came from out of state. Murray lives in Las Vegas and is licensed to practice in Texas, Nevada and California.
Federal drug regulations include controls over whether and how frequently a doctor can write prescriptions over the phone, and DEA agents could be looking to see if these rules were broken, Rosenbluth said.
"You can't just get on the phone and continue to prescribe something for someone without having seen them for a long period of time," she said.
Jackson had a well-known history of using prescription medications, especially painkillers. Following his death, Cherilyn Lee, a registered nurse who had worked for Jackson, told the AP she repeatedly rejected his demands for the drug Diprivan, also known as Propofol. It's a potent anesthetic used in operating rooms and it would be highly unusual to have it in a private home.
Uri Geller, a former Jackson confidant, said he tried to keep Jackson from abusing painkillers and other prescription drugs, but others in the singer's circle kept him supplied.
"When Michael asked for something, he got it," Geller said in a telephone interview from his suburban London home.
Jackson had multiple doctors and many others like Geller who came in and out of his life. Which people are being interviewed by police is unclear because the LAPD has said virtually nothing about the probe.
"I am not going to make any comments on the investigation," Commander Patrick Gannon, the designated police spokesman on the Jackson case, said by e-mail Thursday.
Any evidence would be turned over to the district attorney's office, which has final say on criminal charges.
One of the key questions is why it took four days for police to issue a search warrant and remove medications from Jackson's home.
Although the home wasn't declared a crime scene, police did tow Murray's car the evening of the death to look for potential evidence.
Vernon J. Geberth, former commanding officer of the Bronx Homicide Task force in New York, said police should have known they were dealing with an extraordinary situation.
"If it's a high-profile person, you have to do more than you would do ordinarily," he said.
Still, Geberth, who now acts as a private forensic consultant, said he believes the LAPD acted appropriately.
"Having a doctor present altered the equation. It was not a homicide scene. It was an emergency medical scene," he said.
Police spokesman Lt. John Romero declined to comment when asked if the LAPD was reviewing its handling of the investigation.
Rosenbluth said if the case ends up as a criminal prosecution, any defense attorney would seize on the LAPD's failure to immediately seal Jackson's home.
"If you can get even one juror think, I don't know, maybe somebody fiddled with the medicine before the police came in and collected it, that's reasonable doubt," she said. "All that the defense attorney needs is one juror."

India media hails gay sex ruling


T
he Indian media has hailed a ruling by a court ruling decriminalising homosexuality in the country.

The ruling on Thursday overturns a 148-year-old colonial law which describes a same-sex relationship as an "unnatural offence".

Homosexual acts were punishable by a 10-year prison sentence.

Many people in India regard same-sex relationships as illegitimate. Rights groups have long argued that the law contravened human rights.

India's Gay Day, headlined The Times Of India

"..this historic ruling could act as a catalyst, encouraging our legislators to shed their blinkers and take a more progressive view on the issue," the newspaper said.

"In 21st century India, it is perverse to penalise adults for their sexual choices."

'Giant step'

Describing the ruling as a "giant step towards globalisation", the newspaper said India had become the 127th country "to take the guilt out of homosexuality". It's okay to be gay, headlined Hindustan Times

Section 377 of the colonial Indian Penal Code, defines homosexual acts as "carnal intercourse against the order of nature" and made them illegal.

"It took 150 years for us India - and 42 years after Britain itself had made homosexuality legal- to figure out that we didn't have a problem with same-sex relationships," Hindustan Times said.

The newspaper said "homosexuality and heterosexuality aren't divisive, emotive issues in Middle India - sexuality is, especially when it concerns women and their perceived behaviour in a still male-dominated, anti-woman society at large".

Sexuality Equality, headlined The Indian Express

"Can a modern democracy intrude upon the private domain of consenting adults on the grounds of 'moral indignation'?," the newspaper wondered.

The newspaper said that the Delhi ruling "may not be the last word on the matter". "But the government must read it for its enlightened constitutionalism".

Writing in the same newspaper, urban policy analyst Gautam Bhan said the ruling was victory for democratic India.

"The judgement should be seen by all of us, gay or straight, no matter what we think of sexuality and homosexuality, as a victory for a secular, democratic, constitutional and free India," he wrote.

"We should all be proud".

Gay and Finally Legal, headlined Mail Today

"Remember that in the end this is a judicial pronouncement that should serve as law only in the absence of legislation," the newspaper said.

"An overhaul of the law lies in the domain of the Parliament".

DNA said that the ruling was the "first step" in a "long battle ahead".

".. there will be reactions against this judgment. Religious groups have protested. But while their right to a point of view is acceptable, to bring religion into this debate is wholly unnecessary - this has to be a social and legal debate."

Sexual revolution in India headlined The Asian Age

"The symbolic significance of this judgement is beyond measure," a writer on the newspaper said.

Don’t Start Building Tipaimukh Dam Before Our Visit: Dhaka


Dhaka, Jul 3 : Asking India not to start work on the Tipaimukh dam project, Dhaka said it was sending a team of lawmakers and experts next month to visit the site before taking up the contentious issue with New Delhi.

Foreign Minister Dipu Moni made the announcement even as pressure mounted against the Sheikh Hasina government to take “political measures” against India to stop building the Tipaimukh dam on Barak river in Manipur state.

Moni told media Wednesday that she had requested Indian Minister of State for External Affairs Preneet Kaur that India should not undertake work till the study team visits the site.

The government would do “whatever is in national interest”, she said.

“Our ties with India are very significant and we will maintain the relations, upholding our national interest,” she said in reply to a question on India’s plan to build the dam at Tipaimukh for power generation.

“It is not the question of hate or love. National interest is what is crucial,” New Age quoted her as saying.

“If the…Tipaimukh dam go(es) against the interest of Bangladesh, we will do whatever is needed to protect our interests,” she said.

Moni said Bangladesh had demanded a meeting of the Joint Rivers Commission, which was formed to discuss water issues between Bangladesh and India. “We will raise the issue at the next JRC meeting,” she said.

To a query, Moni said her office had received communications on the project from New Delhi which the foreign ministry sent to the water resources ministry and the parliamentary standing committee on water resources ministry for analysis.

Environmentalists in Bangladesh say the project will reduce water flow on the Barak river downstream.

They were recently joined by protesters from Manipur who emphasised that damage to the environment would be on both sides of the border.

Barak flows into Bangladesh and joins the Meghna river.

Facing a volley of questions about a remark made last month by Indian High Commissioner Pinak Ranjan Chakravarty, the minister said her “personal view” was that the diplomat “may have” departed from “diplomatic norms”.

She had been present at the seminar where the envoy had called environmentalists opposing the dam project as “so-called experts”.

“I don’t think it is prudent on the part of a foreign minister to respond to comments of a diplomat. Such matters should be handled through proper diplomatic channel,” the minister said.

She said her ministry would take necessary action against the high commissioner if he had indeed breached diplomatic norms by his comments.

The main opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) June 23 demanded immediate ‘withdrawal’ of Chakravarty, accusing him of “meddling into Bangladesh’s internal affairs”.

The Hasina Government is in a blame-game with the BNP on this issue.

“Their (BNP’s) policy is to please India when in power and protest against India when in the opposition,” said State Minister for Foreign Affairs Hassan Mahmood.

Industries Minister Dilip Barua told a seminar Wednesday: “Tipaimukh will cause environmental disaster not only to Bangladesh but also the north-eastern states of India.”

Mamata Banerjee set to present Rly Budget on Jul 3

New Delhi
, Jul 3: Mamata Banerjee is all set to present her 'pro-people' the Railway Budget 2009-10. After nine years, Banerjee will present her third and the big Railway Budget amid expectations of fare revision, more Garib Raths and of course the Rs 20 monthly passes for the commuters that she promised earlier.

Buzz up!
According to sources, Kashmir rail link project and putting the dedicated freight corridor project on fast track are the things that are on the high priority.


Live Updates: Railway Budget 2009-10

However, since the time she said that this time railways will have a 'humane' face to it, the people are expecting big fare revisions, waive off superfast charges . She is also expected to make changes in the Tatkal scheme to make it more passenger friendly.

It is now a popular perception that the railway budget this time would be a quiet affair as opposed to the brouhaha of Lalu Prasad Yadav's presentation. Apart from this there are specualtions if there will be a shift from Bihar to Bengal on the agenda. All the questions can only be answered when the Railway Minister tables her budget on Friday, Jul 3.