Tuesday, July 21, 2009

Nato warning over Afghan mission


N
ato head Jaap de Hoop Scheffer has warned that walking away from the alliance's mission in Afghanistan would have a "devastating" effect.

Speaking in London, the Nato secretary-general said failure would give free run to al-Qaeda.

His comments come as Afghanistan suffers a spike in violence ahead of elections on 20 August.

More foreign troops have been killed in July than in any other month since the US-led invasion in 2001.

In a speech at a think tank, Mr de Hoop Scheffer said Nato allies could not afford to abandon their campaign.

"If we were to walk away, Afghanistan would fall to the Taliban, with devastating effect for the people there - women in particular," he said.

'Burden sharing'

He also said any such move would have an impact on the wider region.

"Pakistan would suffer the consequences, with all that that implies for international security," he said.

"Central Asia would see extremism spread. Al-Qaeda would have a free run again, and their terrorist ambitions are global."

He said Nato members had to realise that the mission was "essential" to their security.

"As much as we may long for the near-perfect security of Cold War deterrence, we must accept that security today requires engagement in far away places - engagement that is dangerous, expensive, open ended, and with no guarantee of success."

Earlier on Monday, the Nato-led force in Afghanistan announced the deaths of four US soldiers in the east of the country.

The deaths bring the number of Nato soldiers killed in July to 56.

Eighteen of those are from the UK, where the rising toll has sparked debate over the country's participation in the Nato-led mission.

Mr de Hoop Scheffer, who met UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown earlier on Monday, acknowledged the sacrifices being made by soldiers from the UK and other allies.

He also called for what he called more equitable "burden sharing" between members of the Nato alliance.

Nominated For Khel Ratna, Mary Kom Regrets it Came So Late


N
ew Delhi, Jul 21 : It’s been three-year wait for the four-time women’s world boxing champion M.C. Mary Kom to get nominated for the Rajiv Gandhi Khel Ratna award. The Manipuri who was finally nominated for the country’s highest sporting award Monday, however, regrets it has come after so long.

“It’s been a long wait for me, I have been applying for the award from the past three years. Despite performing, I wasn’t even nominated. I regret that,” Mary Kom, an Arjuna Award winner and a Padmshree, said as a matter of fact.

The petite lady is nonetheless happy to be nominated.

“After winning my fourth world boxing championship, I visited the sports minister last year and he encouraged me a lot. I am quite relieved and happy today though officially I have not been informed about the nomination yet,” she told IANS.

When told along with her, Beijing Games bronze medallists, boxer Vijender Singh and wrestler Sushil Kumar also have been nominated and stand a chance to be adjudged the joint winners, Mary Kom was quick to say: “The things should go as per the rule. If the rule is that only one person can win the award, then it should be so, whether I win or someone else.”

The mother of twin boys, Mary Kom, who is an inspector in Manipur police, said if she wins she will dedicate the award to her husband and kids.

“My husband has been a big support throughout. I took just a year’s break after giving birth to my twins. Without them, I wouldn’t have reached so far. If I win, I will dedicate the awards to them. And I wish to do even better in the future.”

Is Myanmar Going Nuclear?


B
angkok, Jul 21 : The recent aborted voyage of a North Korean ship, photographs of massive tunnels and a top secret meeting have raised alarm bells that one of the world’s poorest nations may be aspiring to join the nuclear club — with help from its friends in Pyongyang. No one expects military-run Myanmar, also known as Burma, to obtain an atomic bomb anytime soon, but experts have the Southeast Asian nation on their radar screen.

“There’s suspicion that something is going on, and increasingly that cooperation with North Korea may have a nuclear undercurrent. We are very much looking into it,” says David Albright, president of the Institute for Science and International Security, a Washington, DC think tank.

Alert signals sounded recently when a North Korean freighter, the Kang Nam I, headed toward Myanmar with undisclosed cargo. Shadowed by the US Navy, it reversed course and returned home earlier this month.

It is still not clear what was aboard. US and South Korean officials suspected artillery and other non-nuclear arms, but one South Korean intelligence expert, citing satellite imagery, says the ship’s mission appeared to be related to a Myanmar nuclear programme and also carried Scud-type missiles.

The expert, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the issue, said North Korea is helping Myanmar set up uranium- and nuclear-related facilities, echoing similar reports that have long circulated in Myanmar’s exile community and media.

Meanwhile, Japanese police arrested a North Korean and two Japanese nationals last month for allegedly trying to export a magnetic measuring device to Myanmar that could be used to develop missiles.

And a recent report from Washington-based Radio Free Asia and Myanmar exile media said senior Myanmar military officers made a top secret visit late last year to North Korea, where an agreement was concluded for greatly expanding cooperation to modernize Myanmar’s military muscle, including the construction of underground installations. The military pact report has yet to be confirmed.

In June, photographs, video and reports showed as many as 800 tunnels, some of them vast, dug in Myanmar with North Korean assistance under an operation code-named “Tortoise Shells.” The photos were reportedly taken between 2003 and 2006.

Thailand-based author Bertil Lintner is convinced of the authenticity of the photos, which he was the first to obtain. However, the purpose of the tunnel networks, many near the remote capital of Naypyitaw, remains a question mark.

“There is no doubt that the Burmese Generals would like to have a bomb so that they could challenge the Americans and the rest of the world,” says Lintner, who has written books on both Myanmar and North Korea. “But they must be decades away from acquiring anything that would even remotely resemble an atomic bomb.”

David Mathieson of the New York-based Human Rights Watch, who monitors developments in Myanmar, says that while there’s no firm evidence the Generals are pursuing a nuclear weapons capability, “a swirl of circumstantial trends indicates something in the nuclear field is going on that definitely warrants closer scrutiny by the international community.”

Albright says some of the suspicion stems from North Korea’s nuclear cooperation with Syria, which now possesses a reactor. Syria had first approached the Russians, just as Myanmar did earlier, but both countries were rejected, so the Syrians turned to Pyongyang — a step Myanmar may also be taking.

Since the early 2000s, dissidents and defectors from Myanmar have talked of a “nuclear battalion,” an atomic “Ayelar Project” working out of a disguised flour mill and two Pakistani scientists who fled to Myanmar following the September 11 World Trade Centre attack providing assistance. They gave no detailed evidence.

Now a spokesman for the self-styled Myanmar government-in-exile, the National Coalition Government of the Union of Burma, says that according to sources working with the dissident movement inside the Myanmar Army, there are two heavily guarded buildings under construction “to hold nuclear reactors” in central Myanmar.

Villagers in the area have been displaced, said spokesman Zinn Lin.

Andrew Selth of Australia’s Griffith University, who has monitored Myanmar’s possible nuclear moves for a decade, says none of these reports has been substantiated and calls the issue an “information black hole.”

He also said that Western governments are cautious in their assessments, remembering the intelligence blunders regarding suspected weapons of mass destruction in Saddam Hussein’s Iraq.

A US State Department official, speaking on customary rules of anonymity, said he would not comment on intelligence-related matters such as nuclear proliferation.

“I don’t want that to be seen as confirmation one way or the other. Obviously, any time that a country does business with North Korea we’re going to watch to see what that is,” the official said.

Alarm bells about Myanmar’s aspirations have rung before. In 2007, Russia signed an agreement to establish a nuclear studies centre in Myanmar, build a 10-megawatt nuclear research reactor for peaceful purposes and train several hundred technicians in its operation.

However, Russia’s atomic agency Rosatom said recently that “there has been no movement whatsoever on this agreement with Burma ever since.”

Even earlier, before the military seized power, Myanmar sought to develop nuclear energy, sending physicists to the United States and Britain for studies in the 1950s. The military government established a Department of Atomic Energy in 2001 under U Thaung, a known proponent of nuclear technology who currently heads the Ministry of Science and Technology.

The regime has remained silent on whatever its plans may be. A Myanmar government spokesman did not respond to an e-mail asking about Russian and North Korean involvement in nuclear development.

In a rare comment from inside Myanmar, Chan Tun, former ambassador to North Korea turned democracy activist, told the Thailand-based Irrawaddy magazine, “To put it plainly: Burma wants to get the technology to develop a nuclear bomb.”

“However, I have to say that it is childish of the Burmese Generals to dream about acquiring nuclear technology since they can’t even provide regular electricity in Burma,” the Myanmar exile publication quoted him last month as saying.

Some experts think the Generals may be bluffing.

“I would think that it’s quite possible Yangon would like to scare other countries or may feel that talking about developing nuclear technologies will give them more bargaining clout,” said Cristina-Astrid Hansell at the California-based James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies. “This is not unreasonable, given the payoffs North Korea has gotten for its nuclear program.”

Main Mumbai suspect pleads guilty


T
he leading suspect in last November's deadly attacks in the Indian city of Mumbai (Bombay) has pleaded guilty.

Mohammad Ajmal Amir Qasab stood up before the court to say he admitted his role in the killings.

Mr Qasab, who is a Pakistani, faces 86 charges, including waging war on India, murder and possessing explosives.

It is not clear why he changed his plea after pleading not guilty in May to all charges. More than 170 people died in the attacks, nine of them gunmen.

Prosecutors say Mr Qasab is the sole surviving attacker.

He could face the death penalty if his confession is accepted and judges agree to impose the maximum penalty.

'Shocked'

The BBC's Prachi Pinglay, who was in the courtroom in Mumbai, said Mr Qasab appeared calm.
He said there had been no pressure on him to confess and it had been his decision to do so.

"I request the court to accept my plea and pronounce the sentence," he told the judge, smiling.

Prosecutor Ujjwal Nikam said: "We were not expecting this. We were all shocked when he made a plea of guilt.

"It is for the court to decide whether to accept his plea or not. It was all of a sudden. The court is now recording his plea."

Shortly afterwards Mr Nikam told the BBC the confession was "a victory for the prosecution".

During his testimony, the suspect gave details of his journey from Pakistan, the attacks at a historic railway station in Mumbai and the city's Cama hospital.

Mr Qasab's lawyer said he had nothing to do with the confession.

It is not fully clear what prompted Mr Qasab to change his plea.

He said he had done so because Pakistan had finally admitted he was a Pakistani citizen, but that was some time ago.

Police say Mr Qasab confessed before a magistrate to the attacks after his arrest, but he retracted that confession at an early hearing.

His lawyers said then that it had been coerced.

Wept in court

Mohammad Ajmal Amir Qasab, 21, was arrested on the first day of the attacks and has been in Indian custody ever since.
In his initial appearances before the court, Mr Qasab appeared relaxed and smiled and grinned.

But more recently, he broke down and wept in court as a witness recounted the violent events which took place over three days in late November.

The attacks led to a worsening of relationship between India and Pakistan.

India accused Pakistan-based fighters from the banned militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba of carrying out the attacks.

In the immediate aftermath of the killings, Pakistan denied any responsibility, but later admitted the attacks had been partly planned on its soil.

Islamabad also eventually admitted that Mr Qasab was a Pakistani citizen.